The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Powerpoint
Author's Note: This is by far the most popular post on my weblog - I've even been cited in Wikipedia!
I appreciate all the traffic, and invite you to check out my other posts on presentations - including ...
- Five Under-Emphasized PowerPoint Best Practices
- Project Status Dashboards Best Practice (and a PowerPoint trick)
- Lighten Up, Francis - Loosen Up That PowerPoint
Other popular categories on this site include Web 2.0 (wikis, blogs, and other things), the Business Value of IT, Project Management, and PMO (Project Management Office) ... including posts like these ...
- What's the Difference between Announcements, Blogs, Discussions, Wikis?
- The Iron Triangle - Quality is a Feature that We Choose to Omit from Projects
- The Law of Large Numbers - or, why Enterprise Wikis are Fundamentally Challenged
- Thoughts on Why Tech Folks Hate Documentation
- Innovation That Matters - Substance Over Style
Also - please be sure to subscribe to the feed, for future posts on PowerPoint, simplifying technical communications, and other business-oriented issues for IT.
Thanks for your interest! - Jim MacLennan
There's a lot of blog traffic these days on Powerpoint and good presentation practices. This topic pops up every once in a while, and I've been noticing some new blogs, some resurgent older ones, and lots of interesting opinions.
Two new ones of note:
Presentation Zen: by Garr Reynolds, has a different approach, well at least of late - he is reviewing / talking about different presentation "methods" / styles. Some of this stuff is worth reviewing - especially if you are working to get visibility / buy-in, trying to rise above the clutter of standard corporate presentations.
- The Monta Method - refugee from a game show, but it pulls in the audience, gets them engaged
- The Godin Method - focuses on visuals that catalyze strong ideas; freely admits that presenting is selling
- Hey, that's an idea that not enough folks embrace! Way too many corporate presentations are just slides filled with long text, read aloud by the presenter - PowerPoint as Big-Text Word Processor (independent validation on this and other classic PPT issues problems - see Johansson's post)
- The Kawasaki Method - ten slides, ten major ideas. A nice way to address the "eating an elephant" issue that many presentations struggle with - how to chunk up the information into bite-sized pieces
- The Takahashi Method - Apparently, also known as the Lessig Method; One word per slide, keep the pictures simple
- One stellar example of this approach has been pointed to by many - first citing I saw was BoingBoing - by Dick Hardt, founder and CEO of Sxip, on Identity 2.0. Immediately engaging, really does an excellent job of explaining a not-obvious concept, and the style really appeals to the digerati.
Death to Bad Powerpoint: yet another site that laments the lack of style in most PPTs, but this one has had some good posts, including a pointer to a terrific 10 Commandments article, which is the best simple list of critical things you must / must not do - my favorite is "avoid reading your slides", something that really drives me up a wall. He's also citing a 2003 article that places a cost on time spent in meetings.
Technorati Tags: powerpoint, presentation, effective, communication, monta, godin, kawasaki, takahashi, lessig, hardt, sxip, identity, style
Labels: presentations